Listen to your brethren libs. This is an incorrect unsound politically motivated court decision made by radical dem judges.
SCOTUS TO BITCH SLAP COLORADO SUPREME COURT
- Thread starter PalmettoTiger1
- Start date
Don't attack YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT OVER LIES and you won't have to worry about it!
Did you research and vet this before blindly posting this crap from a bot named The Vigilant Fox?
Of course not.
And, the article claims that they are backed by the "liberal group" actblue. anyone who thinks that sentence makes sense, has no idea what they are talking about.
At least read the articles you post, or have an idea what is in them. That article pretty much proves the characterization of the events that day by the crowd at the capitol is straight bs.Only a loser that wants to absolve himself of his guilt would say it wasn't a coup attempt because it didn't work.
Why did Trump bring them there and enrage them with his speech? Don't tell me again about the couple of pretty lines he threw out there that you know are immaterial - he brought them there to intimidate Congress into not counting the votes and you know it. If he didn't want it to happen, he wouldn't have waited so long to stop it.
The evidence is overwhelming from his calls to Raffensberger and the Michigan call we are hearing about today, to the Eastman plan devised beforehand, which included the fake electors. It was all part and parcel of an attempt to steal the election that he lost by 7 million votes. He didn't apologize for any of it either which also goes to intent. It was a damn coup attempt, period.
"Prosecutors have said teams of Oath Keepers guarded the arsenal of firearms and were prepared to rush them into the hands of extremists in the capital if needed."
Oath Keepers jury hears about massive weapon cache on Jan. 6
A member of the Oath Keepers who traveled to Washington before the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol testified Wednesday about a massive cache of weapons the far-right extremist group stashed in a Virginia hotel room.apnews.com
Audio Shows Trump Pressured Michigan Officials To Stop Vote Certification In 2020, Report Says
Trump currently faces four criminal cases, two of which accuse him of election interference at the federal and state levels.www.forbes.com
The bold part is simply moronic. Tell me how you reconcile these facts. At least a large portion of the crowd there was intent on a coup(spurred by trumps speeches). The oath keepers, who at least had enough mental acuity to amass this large cash of weapons unnoticed, was also intent on a coup attempt. They had and planned to use, if needed, this massive cash of weapons. They were met at the capitol with armed police and secret service agents and were at a decisive weapons disadvantage which would mean almost certain failure of their coup attempt. They didn't use any of the massive cash of weapons they brought exclusively to have if they needed them.
So what is more likely, they got there and said you know what, we changed our mind, F Trump. Or, they never intended to use them for what you say they did?
Also, I am not excusing what actually did happen that day. I have said multiple times if I had been in charge, I would have warned the crowd with bullhorns that anyone crossing the barriers and approaching the building would be shot. Then I would have shot the first one who tried it. You don't let a mob rule, and you certainly don't let anyone in any govt buildings- particularly the capitol building.
Blah, blah, blah - why did they bring this huge cache of weapons if they didn't think they might use them? What good would they do in their hotel room? Given the right circumstances, they certainly would have and you can listen to Stewart Rhodes words for yourself to know it's true.
What do you think these guys wanted?
And remember, if Trump didn't approve of this, would he have told them "We Love You, You're Very Special?, would he play their songs at his rallies?, would he promise to pardon them?
No, a good President wouldn't do this and a good American citizen wouldn't excuse this, but you already have by blatantly stating you'll be happy to vote for him despite his crimes and his vow to do worse.
Bottom line, it was a coup and you will be complicit in rewarding him for his corruption, so you are the problem here and it's why you simp for him and try to downplay his crimes. It's you.
So what were "the right circumstances", in your opinion?Blah, blah, blah - why did they bring this huge cache of weapons if they didn't think they might use them? What good would they do in their hotel room? Given the right circumstances, they certainly would have and you can listen to Stewart Rhodes words for yourself to know it's true.
What do you think these guys wanted?
And remember, if Trump didn't approve of this, would he have told them "We Love You, You're Very Special?, would he play their songs at his rallies?, would he promise to pardon them?
No, a good President wouldn't do this and a good American citizen wouldn't excuse this, but you already have by blatantly stating you'll be happy to vote for him despite his crimes and his vow to do worse.
Bottom line, it was a coup and you will be complicit in rewarding him for his corruption, so you are the problem here and it's why you simp for him and try to downplay his crimes. It's you.
According to the article YOU posted of his COURT TESTIMONY they brought the weapons in case dem terror groups like antifa showed up and they needed them for protection. That did not happen. They didn't need them, so they didn't use them.
Again, you make yourself look stupid with comments like "what do you think these guys wanted?" Well, if they wanted what you think they wanted, they had the means and opportunity to try and do exactly what you say they wanted but DID NOT DO IT! If they wanted to do what you say, they would have had a pretty good shot at doing it - at least temporarily. There were plenty of them and they had plenty of weapons. They did nothing.
On top of that you keep insisting trump was urging them to do it and still they did not. Again, please explain why they did not do anything if they were there, had plenty of weapons, and trump was urging them to do it? Just one time, give me a reasonable explanation of why they did nothing.
Just like every Trump supporter, you're hopeless, but this is easy.
Because they ushered all the Congessmembers out of the Capitol before they could get their hands on them and when Trump finally realized it wasn't going to work, he told them to leave... but they would have done much, much worse if they had been able to and you know it. They weren't there to play Parcheesi.
And you don't care
Okay, there are a couple of ways this could theoretically be true. The first is that if all the congressmembers were gone before the breach was attempted. You have stated this was not the case multiple times as you insisted many members of congress were still there and in imminent danger.Just like every Trump supporter, you're hopeless, but this is easy.
Because they ushered all the Congessmembers out of the Capitol before they could get their hands on them and when Trump finally realized it wasn't going to work, he told them to leave... but they would have done much, much worse if they had been able to and you know it. They weren't there to play Parcheesi.
And you don't care
The second, and highly unlikely, is that if you are suggesting they intended to overtake the capitol police, secret service and any other protection details of the congresspersons without weapons and then bring in weapons after "they got their hands on them" if they were successful. Is there some other explanation of what transpired that could make your bolded words true? I genuinely do not understand how this could be true given the events of the day.
Please explain what you meant.
im not lolling at you because of the outcome of the case. im sure that it will be overturned at the federal supreme court.
I'm lolling at how easily you are swayed by disinformation (as evidenced by your repeated regurgitation of outright falsehoods in the post i was responding to). and then juxtapose that with the position you've taken repeatedly (that it's the liberals who are slaves to propaganda), and i lolled.
There at least 4 liberals who who are slaves to propaganda, and they are on the supreme court of CO.
Seriously, of all the things trump has been charged with, if it was actually a forgone conclusion he attempted a coup, or is guilty of insurrection, treason, etc., please explain to me why no one has even hinted at charging him with any of these? Surely, if there is a crime the doj would pursue against someone, treason/insurrection/etc would be high on the list, no?
You all said it was an auntie tifa setup. You said most of the people there were 3 letter institutions and auntie tifa. So, they should have been spending all their bullets killing the inciting phonies?
lololol
conspiracy to defraud the U.S. (18 U.S. Code § 371), conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding (18 U.S. Code § 1512), obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding (18 U.S. Code § 1512) and conspiracy against rights (18 U.S. Code § 241).
They did charge him dumbo but you saw it with your own eyes as well. And for the 10th time in this very same thread, he didn't have to be criminally charged to find that he "engaged" in insurrection. They spent a week listening to the evidence and then wrote a thoughtful 132 page opinion that I seriously doubt you've read, where they use real logic, not the spaghetti logic you use for all your misdirection.
"The indictment noted that Trump "directed the people in front of him to head to the Capitol, suggested he was going with them, and told them to give Members of Congress 'the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.'"
The president did not join in the march and returned to the White House where he observed the riot on TV, prosecutors allege.
"A mass of people-including individuals who had traveled to Washington and to the Capitol at the Defendant's direction-broke through barriers cordoning off the Capitol grounds and advanced on the building, including by violently attacking law enforcement officers trying to secure it," the indictment said."
What's in the Jan. 6 Trump indictment
A new federal indictment laid out the details of the former president's alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.
Your attempts to downplay the lawlessness of your orange 1 man walking crime wave know no bounds. However, your question makes no sense, which is normal for you but this one is murkier than most.
I did not say all the congressmembers were gone before the breech was attempted, you are putting words in my mouth, I said "before they could get their hands on them"
IS THIS YOU?
You call it disinformation because you can’t use your own logic to debate it. You’re no better than the others on here.
What you refuse to admit is the beaten to death liberal narrative is dying. Why would they be going after someone so feverishly when they beat him fair and square by millions of votes in the safest most secure election ever? You guys all went from “we pray it’s Trump on the ballot” to “we can’t let him on the ballot because of democracy.”
Seems like the left is starting to worry he might win again and why wouldn’t he, you’ve turned him into martyr.
What the actual f*ck are you talking about? You can’t literally think that’s true?
You would be a great fit in mainland China. Happy to start a go fund me to get you there in luxury.
They refused to do the joint search, review and collection of documents despite the defense team pleading for an open and collaborative process. They wanted the narrative, they didn’t want the documents because he didn’t have any highly classified documents. This is why DOJ is fighting soI don't believe you but why does this matter? He hid the documents from his legal team as well. He lied and said he had turned over all the documents when he knew he hadn't. He had two of his houseboys move some of the boxes out of the storage room before Corcoran had a chance to search the room.
What a stupid defense you're putting up for this criminal
Attorney warned Trump 'it's going to be a crime' if he didn't comply with subpoena for classified docs: Sources
A lawyer for Donald Trump told investigators she warned Trump that not complying with a subpoena to return all classified documents is "going to be a crime," sources say.abcnews.go.com
Hard to keep the seal on the contents of what they collected.
You don’t think the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc would know if he had nuclear codes? Grow up Peter Pan
Dude, just because the 40% of the population that you're a part of worship him, doesn't mean the rest of the world does. Yet you insist on destroying our institutions at home and our relationships with the rest of the world, except for the enemy dictators that Trump gets on his knees for.
Read what this conservative British publication thinks
Donald Trump poses the biggest danger to the world in 2024
What his victory in America’s election would mean
So you think that the British government is going to stop being friends with America if Trump is on office? Do you understand how utterly junior that makes you look? We are their biggest defense ally. Same with anyone in NATO…..we’ve been subsidizing their defense for decades.Dude, just because the 40% of the population that you're a part of worship him, doesn't mean the rest of the world does. Yet you insist on destroying our institutions at home and our relationships with the rest of the world, except for the enemy dictators that Trump gets on his knees for.
Read what this conservative British publication thinks
Donald Trump poses the biggest danger to the world in 2024
What his victory in America’s election would meanwww.economist.com
What I think will happen is Europe will start to pull away because they will no longer see us as a reliable partner. He constantly badgers their leaders, pulled us out of the Paris Climate accord and will possibly pull out of NATO. They will surely be left to their own devices against Putin, his BFF. They've made it clear they won't trust us anymore if you've been paying attention. But you don't give a fvck about our country or our relationships with allies as long as he OWNS THE LIBS. You're the problem!
Europe must not be caught short if Trump wins again
American talk of a ‘dormant Nato’ should be a wake-up call for leaders on the continent
"Ukrainians and Europeans were lucky enough that the man sitting in the Oval Office was not Trump but Joe Biden. Today, however, alarm bells are ringing in European capitals, where US opinion polls ahead of next year’s presidential election are being monitored with a degree of alarm. In 2016, Europeans were caught by surprise; this time, there are plenty of harbingers of the outcome they dread. Faced with the distinct possibility of Trump returning to the White House, Europeans should brace for the storm. Trump II will be even worse than Trump I, their friends in Washington warn: no more adults in the room, weakened checks and balances, hardened Republicans all around."
After Trump, allies ask: Can we trust the Americans?
Analysis: "I'm sure not everything will go back to what it was," said Margot Wallström, Sweden's former foreign minister.
www.nbcnews.com
Europe must resist pressure to become ‘America’s followers,’ says Macron
The ‘great risk’ Europe faces is getting ‘caught up in crises that are not ours,’ French president says in interview.
www.politico.eu
Tone deaf.What I think will happen is Europe will start to pull away because they will no longer see us as a reliable partner. He constantly badgers their leaders, pulled us out of the Paris Climate accord and will possibly pull out of NATO. They will surely be left to their own devices against Putin, his BFF. They've made it clear they won't trust us anymore if you've been paying attention. But you don't give a fvck about our country or our relationships with allies as long as he OWNS THE LIBS. You're the problem!
"In May 2017, after two bruising summits with the new US President Donald Trump, German Chancellor Angela Merkel famously told her peers: “We Europeans must now take our fate into our own hands. We have to know that we must fight for our future on our own.”Europe must not be caught short if Trump wins again
American talk of a ‘dormant Nato’ should be a wake-up call for leaders on the continentwww.ft.com
"Ukrainians and Europeans were lucky enough that the man sitting in the Oval Office was not Trump but Joe Biden. Today, however, alarm bells are ringing in European capitals, where US opinion polls ahead of next year’s presidential election are being monitored with a degree of alarm. In 2016, Europeans were caught by surprise; this time, there are plenty of harbingers of the outcome they dread. Faced with the distinct possibility of Trump returning to the White House, Europeans should brace for the storm. Trump II will be even worse than Trump I, their friends in Washington warn: no more adults in the room, weakened checks and balances, hardened Republicans all around."
After Trump, allies ask: Can we trust the Americans?
Analysis: "I'm sure not everything will go back to what it was," said Margot Wallström, Sweden's former foreign minister.
Europe must resist pressure to become ‘America’s followers,’ says Macron
The ‘great risk’ Europe faces is getting ‘caught up in crises that are not ours,’ French president says in interview.
Europe can’t pull away, they haven’t funded their military in 4 decades. They can’t defend themselves. You libs want socialism here, the same as Europe but America is why they have things like free healthcare…..we overspend on defense to prop Europe up. Go ask Germany.
Checks and balances?????? omg …..we don’t even know what Ukraine has done with the funding, we didn’t track any of it, same with other non-domestic funding. We are still
giving the Taliban billions , billions to build new terrorist networks and capabilities. That’s all under this admin.
You guys cheered trans titties on the White House lawn but you’re talking about adults in the room? The rest of the world has stopped taking us seriously and it’s truly hard to blame them.
Here’s an idea, why don’t you folks try focusing on his policies and putting up
Logical defense as to why they won’t work? The Hitler, end of democracy rhetoric is a beaten dog that America has seen/heard enough of.
Outside of Islamic war zones, have you ever visited the rest of the world? Because if you had, you'd know this wouldn't phase Europeans in the least. You're just wrong here.
You don't speak for the majority of Americans so what you're really saying is magats are tired of hearing "the truth" about what Shitler is going to do. We know you approve of it but you don't want the message to be widely spread because you fear it may affect his re-election chances. Once he's in power, you'll be waving a Nazi flag and cheering all the released insurrectionists at the celebration parade while blaring Ted Nugent from your boom box.
Many moons ago I was in the presence of the football and understood what it meant
Nuclear codes do not stay the same
They change based on time and circumstances
The moment Trump left office the codes were changed
After office he NEVER HAD THE CODES OR ACCESS TO THEM
NAME THE AMOUNT OF MONEY YOU ARE WILLING TO LOSE IF YOU WANT TO BET ON IT
I want to apologize to the Colorado Supreme Court and the gang of 4 Supremes
They are a ROCK GROUP
Doing what they did is driving up Trumps popularity and fund raising
Do it again harder
Not being on the ballot in Colorado would not even matter in the final vote
Now Colorado may come into play
Thank you Democrats for the moronic play
They are a ROCK GROUP
Doing what they did is driving up Trumps popularity and fund raising
Do it again harder
Not being on the ballot in Colorado would not even matter in the final vote
Now Colorado may come into play
Thank you Democrats for the moronic play
i call it disinformation because its made up.
Do you approve or disapprove of the Colorado Supreme Court ruling that Donald Trump can't appear on the state's 2024 Republican presidential primary ballot because his actions leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021 takeover of the Capitol amount to insurrect
Do you approve or disapprove of the Colorado Supreme Court ruling that Donald Trump can't appear on the state's 2024 Republican presidential primary ballot because his actions leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021 takeover of the Capitol amount to insurrection or rebellion against the United States?
today.yougov.com
Trump lost to a vegetable in a landslide last time. Are you sure this is what you want again? If your goal is a conservative in the WH maybe there is another way? A way that has a real chance?
I would prefer Tim Scott however he simply is not in the right place at the right time with $ support from donars
I also like Ron Desantis and would vote for him second
My third choice is Nicki Hayley
Fourth is Democrat Kennedy
Fifth is Trump if I could pick
However I don’t get to pick I have to deal with what will be on the ballot
If Trump then he gets my vote
There are NO DEMOCRATS on my radar except Kennedy I would vote for
So instead of people screaming about me being a Trump Zombie and suffering TDS they should read my preference chart as I want in Federal government strong reasonable conservative government with a hawkish military strong financial leadership with practicing fiscal responsibility and supply side economics
The candidates I mentioned are in that mold however getting results is the problem
I think ony Trump or Haley are the ones who can make it happen
I am hoping Trump President For 4 followed by Haley for 8 years
I am hoping Haley as VP as she would give Trump some levity and guide him with common sense
I predict she will be the first female President of the US
The US Iron Lady like Margeret Thatcher was to Britain
Not that any of this in future years will affect me as Father Time has been trying to call my lottery number
If not dead by then will be in a nursing home so that will impact me very little cause in the ground solves all my political issues
it will impact my then Senior citizen children and my then college age grandchildren
so you have my wish list for 2025 for Santa
That’s a lot of words when it’s as simple as voting for Tim Scott. I mean, you typed it. Should be easy enough to write it in. If we would all worry about voting for the candidate that represents us best rather than trying to be on the winning team or stop the other team, we’d all be better off.
Shall we play a game?
BREAKING: GOP State Lawmakers Draft Bills to Remove Joe Biden from 2024 Ballots in Three Swing States
www.thegatewaypundit.com
BREAKING: GOP State Lawmakers Draft Bills to Remove Joe Biden from 2024 Ballots in Three Swing States
BREAKING: GOP State Lawmakers Draft Bills to Remove Joe Biden from 2024 Ballots in Three Swing States | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Efforts are underway by Republican lawmakers to draft legislation aimed at removing Joe Biden from the ballots in key swing states Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
This is what i was telling you.
That is so fake LOL
I would crap in my britches if you said Obama or Biden was going to defend me
Both of them are CCP flunkies and part of the NWO trying to undermine and destroy democracy
Because, as usual, you represent a solid approximation of the rest of the worlds population.
International Views of Biden and U.S. Largely Positive
Overwhelmingly, people believe the U.S. interferes in the affairs of other countries (82%), but most also believe the U.S. contributes to peace and stability around the world (61%). U.S. President Joe Biden receives mostly positive reviews from publics around the world with 54% expressing...
www.pewresearch.org
Latest posts
-
Official TI Super Bowl LIX: Philadelphia Eagles vs. Kansas City Chiefs In-game Thread- Latest: TequilasForLoss
-
-
That was a terrible halftime show. Couldn’t understand a single word***- Latest: KennyRogersRoasters
-
